|
|
 Best Sellers | | Home Levi's Men's 569 Loose Straight Leg Jean | |
|  | |  | | | Levi's Men's 569 Loose Straight Leg Jean | | | | | | | |
List Price:
| | |
Our Price:
| $39.99 - $42.99 | |
You Save:
| |
| | | SKU:
00569-4258 | | Availability:
In stock | | |
|
| | Color | | |
| | Features | 100% CottonLow on hipLoose seat & thighMachine wash; tumble dryMade In Cambodia
| |
| | Description | Levi's 569 loose straight jeans are designed to sit below the waist, straight through the leg & knee as well as offering classic five pocket styling. You will find a great relaxed fit in these jeans. International Shipping Prohibited. Cotton. Denim. | |
| | Product Details | | Package Length: | 15.0 inches | | Package Width: | 13.0 inches | | Package Height: | 2.0 inches | | Package Weight: | 2.0 pounds | | Average Customer Rating: |  based on 94 reviews |
| |
| | Customer Reviews | Average Customer Review: ( 94 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
68 of 68 found the following review helpful:
 Boooo! to the new 569 Apr 12, 2011
By Candi E. Ruffini
Anyone who is a long time fan of the levi's 569 beware. Levi's have decided to completely change the cut of this jean and not change the number, so what used to be the 569 is very different from what they are selling now. They are a great deal tighter in the seat and thigh, so the relaxed fit is not nearly as generous. Also they are much lower at the waist almost making them low cut jeans.. For some, this may be exactly what you want, but for those who are long time buyers of this style expect to be disappointed. Shame on levis for pulling the switch. I think if you change the style you should change the number so people know what they are getting. Unfair and confusing of them to keep the number but not they style. I am shipping mine back immediately.
26 of 26 found the following review helpful:
Loose fit my ass Jan 22, 2011
By John
They have completely changed the cut of these jeans. I'm in shape and these jeans barely fit over my thighs. I bought them hoping they would stretch out like my older pair of loose fit jeans the same size. From what I've read however, they've changed manufactureres. Sorry folks, fans of Levi's should just vote with their wallet because apparently they think everyone wants skinny jeans that are pasted on to their legs. I seriously don't even know which brand to try now. These jeans are garbage.
33 of 37 found the following review helpful:
 Easy Nov 09, 2007
By Olukayode Balogun
This is an easy product to review. Basically, while I feel I'm still too young to wear my trousers up under my armpits, I'm equally too old now to wear them down around my thighs - and I'm not exaggerating there; I've seen these dudes with my own eyes. Also, I tried a pair of 501s this summer (apparently, they're all the rage) and they while they were nice and comfortable, they seemed to hug me in inappropriate places. I feel I could wear them but only if I was feeling particularly adventurous.
These jeans though, are just the ticket. They are nice and loose, smart-looking (they go with everything from tuck-in button down shirts to t-shirts to hoodies to sweaters) and I am able to look somewhat trendy with them worn around my hips without looking like I'm trying too hard to look cool, or like mutton dressed as lamb. They are also very resilient. I have three pairs now, including a pair I bought in 2002, one I got on vacation in the summer and the pair I bought here.
If any of this resonates with you, I recommend you pick up a pair or two with dispatch. I was in my local Levi's store a few weeks ago and was told they are going to be discontinued. I was shown the model that will be replacing them (the 7-something, I can't remember the exact number) and I tried on a pair. I didn't like them even half as much as I like these and that's when I decided to get an extra pair online. I cannot recommend them highly enough. These are a great pair of jeans.
11 of 11 found the following review helpful:
A good thing gone bad- nothing loose about them Jun 02, 2011
By Jake
I can't decide whether to burn these jeans or send them to Levi's headquarters with a hate-note. I would return them to Amazon, but I tore off the labels and threw them away. This most recent pair is a full 2" narrower from the thighs down, has small pockets, and rides lower on the waist (the fly is 1" shorter in my size). I'd rather wear Wrangler cowboy jeans than these- they are about as tight and cost less. The 569 used to be good, but isn't anymore.
Seriously, don't buy these jeans if you want a loose fit.
9 of 9 found the following review helpful:
DO NOT BUY THESE JEANS IF YOU LIKED THE WAY THAT 569's FIT IN 2009!!! Jun 06, 2011
By Lou
Dear Levi's,
Someone should sue you for false advertising. What part of "LOOSE" do you not understand? I'm a 34Wx36L and I have worn Levi's jeans since 1990. They always fit me better than any other jeans and the 569 series was always the most comfortable for me. So why would you change the cut so much and still keep the same number AND "loose" on the label???? Do you think anyone else that has been buying these jeans for a long time is going to keep buying them and not notice how much tighter they are?? This is the biggest crock ever! Everyone who bought these jeans for the comfort they USED to provide now has to find another brand. Nice marketing idiots. I ordered 4 new pairs last week and returned them all today. Now I have to find a new brand because these were the only Levi's jeans that fit me well. Anyone who is not a woman and does not have toothpick legs will hate the new 569's.
DO NOT BUY THESE JEANS IF YOU LIKED THE WAY THAT 569's FIT IN 2009!!! THEY HAVE CHANGED THE CUT DRAMATICALLY AND THEY NOW FIT LIKE "SKINNY" JEANS.
If anyone out there knows of any brands of jeans that fit like the old 569's please let me know. Thanks.
See all 94 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| |
| |
| |  | |  |
|
Recently Viewed | You may also like ... |
|
|
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
