|
|
 Best Sellers | | Home Calvin Klein Men's 2-Pack Boxer Brief | |
|  | |  | | | Calvin Klein Men's 2-Pack Boxer Brief | | | | | | | |
List Price:
| | |
Our Price:
| $21.20 - $32.50 | |
You Save:
| |
| | | SKU:
CalvinKleinU3015 | | Availability:
In stock | | |
|
| | Color | | |
| | Features | 100% CottonMachine WashableImported
| |
| | Description | Soft, 100% cotton low rise brief with seamless sides includes one of each color per pack | |
| | Product Details | | Product Weight: | 0.53 pounds | | Package Length: | 1.0 inches | | Package Width: | 1.0 inches | | Package Height: | 1.0 inches | | Package Weight: | 1.0 pounds | | Average Customer Rating: |  based on 15 reviews |
| |
| | Customer Reviews | Average Customer Review: ( 15 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 12 found the following review helpful:
 Awful waistband Sep 04, 2010
By Sean Smith
I have worn Calvin Klein briefs for years, so when I ordered 4 pairs of these I thought I was in for some quality underwear. Boy, was I mistaken!!! The waistband on these is awful!! It rolls up and is seriously cheap. DO NOT BUY THESE!! I will go back to a pair of cheapo Haines becuase they are better quality!What happened to the Old Calvin Klein boxer briefs??
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
 Best of all that I've tried Jul 25, 2009
By B. Stewart
"H0lyC0w"
I like boxer briefs a lot and these are the best I have tried. Others have been Polo Ralph Lauren, Nautica, Helfiger. What makes these stand out is the comfort of the fabric. It's thinner and more flexible than most for a really comfortable fit and feel. One odd thing I'd like to mention is that these are made in Viet Nam and the Philippines - maybe other places also. I think the ones made in the Philippines are slightly better quality.
3 of 3 found the following review helpful:
Best Underwear Ever! Jan 27, 2010
By D. Devine
I'm a Calvin Klein man! I tried Hanes and they have this cheap feel and doesn't feel comfortable as Calvin Klein. These can last longer. Definitely recommend! If you want your stuff wrapped up nice then buy Calvin Klein!
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
disappointing & wimpy feeling Jul 05, 2011
By GaterLater
"GL"
The CalvinKline brand should be great, right? This one was just like all the other cotton boxer briefs (and even most 95% Cotton / 5% Lycra) that I ahve tried over the years. By the time they have been on for half an hour, they are all stretched out, Can't even feel the "legs" of the brief, and it looks frumpy from the legs starting to "crawl" up, not fitting snugly. Might as well use a standard or sport brief, which is actually more comfortable except for the first few seconds it is put on. This type of boxer brief isn't as comfortable as standard after the legs get stretched out, which happens right after putting it on. This style brief (boxer brief) needs to be constructed of a much more resilient material, like nylon/Lycra, instead of this frumpy (soft) 100% cotton and even the cotten with wimpy 5% Lycra content.
 They're OK Feb 05, 2012
By M. J Lane
These are 100% cotton so bear in mind they won't give a consistently tight fit. They will be snug after you take them out of the dryer but they loosen up as you wear them.
The leg holes on these are a little bit smaller than very similar CK boxer briefs I bought a year or so ago. They still fit OK but any smaller and they would be too tight. If you have large thighs you might be initially strangled by the mediums. Though as I mentioned they do loosen up with wear.
These briefs are the CKs that have a lighter gauge cotton. I'm not sure how one is supposed to know in advance how thick the cotton is. I really wish CK would simplify their branding so it is easy to find the same style, thickness, size, etc every single time. Also, if you are looking for a skin tight fit go with CKs synthetic blends--not the 100% cotton.
See all 15 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| |
| |
| |  | |  |
|
Recently Viewed | You may also like ... |
|
|
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
